| To: | Samium Gromoff <deepfire@elvees.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:40:17 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <200609221906.30516.deepfire@elvees.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <200609221906.30516.deepfire@elvees.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 07:06:30PM +0400, Samium Gromoff wrote: > How reliable is 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k-likes in kernels around 2.6.17? > > Is it known to work? it's certainly not as well tested as 4k pages but several people have reported success, most recently also on 32-bit kernels. Btw, r4k is a bit ambigous, did you mean R4000 or 4K? Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k, Samium Gromoff |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k, Samium Gromoff |
| Previous by Thread: | 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k, Samium Gromoff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 16KB PAGE_SIZE on r4k, Samium Gromoff |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |