Re: Differing results from cross and native compilers

[Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>]

Eric DeVolder wrote:
[snip]
> I would have thought that for this simple example I'd get identical
> results. For reasons I have yet to figure out, the cross compiler is
> finding better optimizations than the native, though both are the
> same gcc version. I checked the specs files, and the two are identical
> other than the "cross_compile" setting.

Have you checked (with -v) if the assembler gets the same optimisations
in both cases, and/or (with -save-temps) where in the compile things
start to diverge?


Thiemo