| To: | Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] au1x00 serial real interrupt |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 19:10:37 +0100 |
| Cc: | Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>, Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20060909163907.GA24012@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060522165244.GA16223@enneenne.com> <44FD9587.3030708@ru.mvista.com> <4502ED14.6080506@ru.mvista.com> <20060909163907.GA24012@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > Well, if you need IRQ0 to be real then redefining is_real_interrupt() > is the correct way forward. > > However, Linus' policy is that IRQ0 shall be invalid at least on PCI > systems, and architectures _should_ remap their real IRQ0 to some other > number. Personally I don't like this. Hence why I prefer to give people > the option. I have no strong opinion either. In some cases not having interrupt 0 available sucks because Linux will have to use a different interrupt numbering than system documentation ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fast path for rdhwr emulation for TLS, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: early_initcall, Ashlesha Shintre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] au1x00 serial real interrupt, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] au1x00 serial real interrupt, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |