Re: [PATCH] fast path for rdhwr emulation for TLS

[Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>]

moto wrote:
>   
>> BTW, if the fast emulation can't handle rdhwr in a delay slot, please
>> report a bug on GCC asking it not to put rdhwr in delay slots by
>> default.  It's probably worthwhile.
>>     
>
> If rdhwr was on a delay slot, the slow emulation will be more slower.
> So I think rdhwr should not be put on delay slot anyway regardless
> fast emulation.
>
> I asked on GCC bugzilla a few days ago but can not got feedback yet.
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28126
>   

In spite of the GCC issue, is this patch now at the point where it could
be applied, or at least queued?

Nigel