| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Weird output from pmap |
| From: | "Erik Niessen" <erik.niessen@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 5 Sep 2006 08:55:18 +0200 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=qIaGYaGjsH6ZJV8QbZt80md7yE8lUjJMAE1g7W+0eo7TqMD0CCbZnr/fLNbLfb5nQs6eU5jItxrPX40qapFnD34oIHrbfOv7ZTXlWx34O121YVfYVsufTYPyUqWHvxMmkXDoI4O3Q1HJZa8x6HzCIrEox48Y+HhCDwmES8s6u/w= |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
|
Hi, I am using an embedded development board with a mips 4kEC on it. I use buildroot for building a rootfs and the toolchain. I cross compiled a helloword app. When I look at the output of pmap I see the following /helloworldmips(86) 00400000 (4 KB) r-xp (00:0a 33243002) linux/test/helloworldmips 10000000 (4 KB) rw-p (00:0a 33243002) linux/test/helloworldmips
10001000 (4 KB) rwxp (00:00 0) [heap] 2aaa8000 (20 KB) r-xp (00:07 1795853) /lib/ld-uClibc-0.9.27.so 2aaad000 (4 KB) rw-p (00:00 0) 2aaed000 (4 KB) rw-p (00:07 1795853) /lib/ld- uClibc-0.9.27.so 2aaee000 (48 KB) r-xp (00:07 1795861) /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2aafa000 (252 KB) ---p (00:00 0) 2ab39000 (4 KB) rw-p (00:07 1795861) /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 2ab3a000 (368 KB) r-xp (00:07 1795855) /lib/libuClibc-0.9.27.so 2ab96000 (256 KB) ---p (00:00 0) 2abd6000 (8 KB) rw-p (00:07 1795855) /lib/libuClibc- 0.9.27.so 2abd8000 (16 KB) rw-p (00:00 0) 7fd49000 (84 KB) rwxp (00:00 0) [stack] mapped: 1076 KB writable/private: 128 KB shared: 0 KB It seems that the bss segments of the shared libs are protected and mapped to the zero page. I don't see this when I run this on a linux pc. I have the following questions: - Why is this segment protected? Accessing results in a seg fault. - Why is it so big (252k/256K)? - How much memory is physically allocated for this segment? Thanks for reading sofar Erik Niessen |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] AMD Alchemy: claim UART memory range, Sergei Shtylyov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | no USB device other than storage detected, Tomasz Chmielewski |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] AMD Alchemy: claim UART memory range, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Weird output from pmap, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |