| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] qemu does not have dcache aliases |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> |
| Date: | Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:36:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20060821152657.GB19600@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060820.003338.25478178.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0608211340120.17504@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20060821.225910.108307053.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0608211612090.17504@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20060821152657.GB19600@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:16:21PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > > > > Well, the QEMU cpu has 2-way 2kB dcache... does not have aliasing > > > anyway. :-) > > > > I don't think emulating a bigger cache so that we can add aliases should > > be *that* difficult. Adding aliases themselves might be a bit trickier, > > but the gain would certainly justify the hassle, wouldn't it? > > The cache lookup for every access would have serious impact on performance. > The question is, is it worth the price? Would such patches be acceptable > by the upstream qemu maintainers? Likely not, given that performance is the prime criterion there. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] qemu does not have dcache aliases, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] qemu does not have dcache aliases, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] qemu does not have dcache aliases, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] qemu does not have dcache aliases, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |