| To: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Remove mfinfo[64] used by get_wchan() |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Fri, 18 Aug 2006 23:04:03 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <44E5AFD9.1050101@innova-card.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <44E57F39.2020009@innova-card.com> <20060818.181136.85412687.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <44E5AFD9.1050101@innova-card.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:17:29 +0200, Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why get_frame_info() will be called with info->func_size != 0 ? The > > offset of a _first_ instruction is 0, so "ofs" of this line in > > unwind_stack() will be 0. > > > > info.func_size = ofs; /* analyze from start to ofs */ > > > > because in unwind_stack(), before the line you showed, we do: > > if (!kallsyms_lookup(pc, &size, &ofs, &modname, namebuf)) > return 0; > if (ofs == 0) > return 0; Oh I missed it. > Maybe we should do instead: > > if (!kallsyms_lookup(pc, &size, &ofs, &modname, namebuf)) > return 0; > /* return ra if an exception occured at the first instruction */ > if (ofs == 0) > return ra; Sure. I should be a right fix. This part must be fixed anyway. > And in any cases, if we pass info->func_size = 0 to get_frame_info(), > then it will consider the function size as unknown. I see. You're right. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Image capturing driver for Basler eXcite smart camera, Bill Davidsen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Remove mfinfo[64] used by get_wchan(), Franck Bui-Huu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Remove mfinfo[64] used by get_wchan(), Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Remove mfinfo[64] used by get_wchan(), Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |