linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] Image capturing driver for Basler eXcite smart camera

To: Thomas Koeller <thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Image capturing driver for Basler eXcite smart camera
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 08:27:37 +0000
Cc: Éric Piel <Eric.Piel@lifl.fr>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <200608172230.30682.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <200608102318.04512.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> <200608142126.29171.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com> <20060817153138.GE5950@ucw.cz> <200608172230.30682.thomas.koeller@baslerweb.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Thu 17-08-06 22:30:30, Thomas Koeller wrote:
> On Thursday 17 August 2006 17:31, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Well, I guess v4l api will need to be improved, then. That is still
> > not a reason to introduce completely new api...
> 
> The API as implemented by the driver I submitted is very minimalistic,
> because it is just a starting point. There's more to be added in future,
> like controlling flashes, interfacing to line-scan cameras clocked by
> incremental encodes attached to some conveyor, and other stuff which
> is common in industrial image processing applications. You really do


If it is _common_, we definitely need an API. We do not want the next
driver to reinvent it from scratch, right?
-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>