| To: | vagabon.xyz@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Jul 2006 01:01:37 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <cda58cb80607271203u70b26e23o65b71d3d0c900f94@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060726.232231.59465336.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <44C8CEA4.20000@innova-card.com> <cda58cb80607271203u70b26e23o65b71d3d0c900f94@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 27 Jul 2006 21:03:07 +0200, "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> wrote: > > > + info.func = (void *)(pc - ofs); > > > + info.func_size = ofs; /* analyze from start to ofs */ > > in get_frame_info(), there is the following condition to stop the > prologue analysis > > if (info->func_size && i >= info->func_size / 4) > break; > > Setting info.func_size = ofs may trigger this stop condition very > early, specially if "ofs" is small...I would simply remove this > condition since it's very empirical and IMHO not very usefull. Yes, that is what I wanted. Imagine if a exception happened on first place on non-leaf function. In this case, we must assume the function is leaf since RA is not saved to the stack. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] dump_stack() based on prologue code analysis, Franck Bui-Huu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |