On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:16:42AM +0200, Domen Puncer wrote:
> First a note, that your patch [dbdma.patch] doesn't make any
> difference for me. Well... at least not an obvious one.
That's exactly what it should do, since it's a bug that I do not
yet expect to happen. So no difference is good for now.
Including the patch, so hopefully Ralf sees it again. :-)
> OK. I have an IDE drive connected now. It's a bit weird, with
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_AU1XXX_PIO_DBDMA I can't enable dma with
> hdparm, but if works on about 6 MB/sec.
> With CONFIG_BLK_DEV_IDE_AU1XXX_MDMA2_DBDMA, I can enable DMA,
> but it works slow, like 1.7 MB/sec.
> Seems odd to me.
Hmmmm, strange. You should at least expect the other way around.
Transferring you to the mailing list, hopefully somebody over
there has got a clue.
$ cat ~/.signature
Freddy Spierenburg <email@example.com> http://freddy.snarl.nl/
GnuPG: 0x7941D1E1=C948 5851 26D2 FA5C 39F1 E588 6F17 FD5D 7941 D1E1
$ # Please read http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2015.txt before complain!
Description: Text document
Description: Digital signature