| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__ |
| From: | "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Jun 2006 17:12:38 +0000 (UTC) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20060608165136.GA17152@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0606080134480.26638@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <20060608165136.GA17152@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Interesting that a bug of this sort manages to survive for that long. > I guess it is proof that barely anybody is using 64-bit little endian, > yet we're cursed to support it. I might conclude that barely anybody is *yet* using NPTL on 64-bit MIPS at all, for either endianness, given that most of the problems I've been finding, in glibc as well as the kernel, don't seem endian-specific and would probably show up in a glibc testsuite run for either endianness. MIPS64 NPTL is very new and seems to do a good job of showing up bugs in the three syscall interfaces. -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__, Daniel Jacobowitz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: N32 sigset and __COMPAT_ENDIAN_SWAP__, Kumba |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |