Re: Problem with TLB mcheck!

["Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>]

On Wed, 31 May 2006, art wrote:

> @@ -1260,7 +1260,7 @@
>         }
>  #endif
> 
> -       memcpy((void *)CAC_BASE, final_handler, 0x100);
> +       memcpy((void *)ebase, final_handler, 0x100);
> }
> 
> And it seem than no problem now (`cat /bin/busybox > box` work as much
> as need!).
> I think this is wright way, but not all - I'am not guru in memory
> subsystem and can miss something! So wait for your advices!

 That change has been in the tree since Apr 16th -- there is a reason you 
should always try the latest revision before reporting a problem.

  Maciej