| To: | dmitry pervushin <dpervushin@ru.mvista.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] NEC EMMA2RH support |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> |
| Date: | Thu, 18 May 2006 12:17:04 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <1147950509.8223.10.camel@diimka-laptop> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1147946423.8223.4.camel@diimka-laptop> <20060518195404.663eba86.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> <1147950509.8223.10.camel@diimka-laptop> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
dmitry pervushin wrote: > On ???, 2006-05-18 at 19:54 +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 18 May 2006 14:00:23 +0400 > > dmitry pervushin <dpervushin@ru.mvista.com> wrote: > > > > > Index: linux-malta/arch/mips/emma2rh/markeins/int-handler.S > > > =================================================================== > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ linux-malta/arch/mips/emma2rh/markeins/int-handler.S > > > > You should rewrite the assembler interrupt handler to C code. > Why ?? Could you please comment the statement ? The other handlers were rewritten in C recently. > May be, I have > misunderstood the modern ways in linux kernel development, but I am > pretty sure that assembler interrupt handler will be faster than C > code. Only marginally, it doesn't outweigh the maintenance trouble. Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] NEC EMMA2RH support, dmitry pervushin |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Any examples / docs for getting SPARSEMEM to work?, Chad Reese |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NEC EMMA2RH support, dmitry pervushin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] NEC EMMA2RH support, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |