linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] create consistency in "system type" selection

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [MIPS] create consistency in "system type" selection
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 10:27:25 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <20060509213453.GA32050@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20060509213453.GA32050@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Tue, 9 May 2006, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> The "system type" Kconfig options on MIPS are not consistent.  For
> some platforms, only the name is listed while other entries are
> prepended with "Support for".  Remove this as it doesn't make sense
> when describing the "system type".  This is in line with how e.g.
> ARM handles this.

I guess the `Support for' prefix came from the era you could compile one kernel
that supported multiple systems.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                                                Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                                            -- Linus Torvalds

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>