linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re : module allocation

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re : module allocation
From: moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 07:19:49 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.fr; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2iKUVKnnio8la8F9feZsOI6xYjSXzocgnEdyRayzG38LAjtd+qRCMK9RUJj5qWQS98/WuVNiBFOlWe9VTjFGNtfDQf3wxhEe+OitrDc28eTkRLDxsJZOTE4DNyaeeqYgEWatCg+ttUZuHFurknuasrqrvsxA8nQI9S2e9Q10ze4= ;
In-reply-to: <20060428200307.GA17705@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Reply-to: moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
> There is another reason against putting modules into mapped space and
> that's the need for -mlong-calls which generates larger, less efficient
> code.

BTW, I don't see why -mlong-calls wouldn't be needed for GFP module
allocation. Can you explain ?

Thanks






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>