| To: | moreau francis <francis_moreau2000@yahoo.fr> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Re : module allocation |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 29 Apr 2006 21:39:59 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20060429094101.90843.qmail@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060429094101.90843.qmail@web25806.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 11:41:01AM +0200, moreau francis wrote: > maybe that would make sense to do some benchmarks ? It would be interesting to actually have some numbers, yes. I expect the impact to be significantly less than of the PIC code used for userspace. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | SGI Hardware in the DC area, Nick B. |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | SETNAME (set nodename) in syscall.c, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | Re : module allocation, moreau francis |
| Next by Thread: | The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.1 is released, H. J. Lu |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |