| To: | "Bin Chen" <binary.chen@gmail.com>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: what will be caused by setting TLB's virtual address part to unmapped address? |
| From: | "Uhler, Mike" <uhler@mips.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Apr 2006 08:18:50 -0700 |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| Thread-index: | AcZnsb965OS7buOvQ2up6fQPn3icmAAADZtQ |
| Thread-topic: | what will be caused by setting TLB's virtual address part to unmapped address? |
|
What you're seeing is the standard
sequence used to initialize the TLB. The processor doesn't look at entries
for kseg0, so those TLB entries are ignored.
/gmu
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org [mailto:linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org] On Behalf Of Bin Chen Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 8:14 AM To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: what will be caused by setting TLB's virtual address part to unmapped address? Hi, |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | what will be caused by setting TLB's virtual address part to unmapped address?, Bin Chen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] vr41xx: defconfig update, Yoichi Yuasa |
| Previous by Thread: | what will be caused by setting TLB's virtual address part to unmapped address?, Bin Chen |
| Next by Thread: | CROSS_COMPILE in environment variable, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |