| To: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | does the FTL/NTFL can be used with "GPL" licence? |
| From: | zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 24 Apr 2006 11:36:39 +0800 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=e2uOf8JD7Lin/PRF03ciLDp63tyz9hHzTxOHOzO2huB558eZrMKhl+OS3EJ5DkhD8G2xCufbEjmYNq+pp8u38WsGc2YzfbLPadqqDbInPAVL6aVNF0dNe2AFiyHsVfflp7wfEfXEr/F29e6UsCOt+ORxqwGqKYjaUIsnfWyW9Qs= |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
i see in the source code, that FTL under "MPL", NFTL under "GPL", does it mean that i can modify the code for my fash filesystem if my code under "GPL" licence? Best Regards Zhuzhenhua |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH][RFT] HPT3xxN clocking fixes, Sergei Shtylyov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Reading an entire cacheline, Kim, Jong-Sung |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH][RFT] HPT3xxN clocking fixes, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Next by Thread: | what will be caused by setting TLB's virtual address part to unmapped address?, Bin Chen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |