| To: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Diff between Linus' and linux-mips git: elf.h |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 7 Apr 2006 23:21:42 +0100 |
| Cc: | Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <090d01c65a6b$623f6480$10eca8c0@grendel> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060219234318.GA16311@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060220000141.GX10266@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060220001126.GA17967@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060220003128.GD17967@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060220113420.GB5594@linux-mips.org> <20060407171910.GU6869@deprecation.cyrius.com> <090d01c65a6b$623f6480$10eca8c0@grendel> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:47:40PM +0200, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > Arguably, whatever's used by binutils should be the tie-breaker. > Googling around, I see that the EM_MIPS_RS3_LE value was > added in the October 4, 1999 draft of the ELF spec, but inexplicably > the alias with EM_MIPS_RS4_BE was left in place - perhaps they > were supposed to be disambiguated by some 32-vs-64-bit flag > somewhere. A random sampling of ELF documents on the web > shows the vast majority calling out RS3_LE and not RS4_BE. No way to actually resolve this one; not even binutils oldtimer Ian Lance Taylor can remember the reasons for the change anymore. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix swap entry for MIPS32 36-bit physical address, Sergei Shtylyov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] FIx mprotect() syscall for MIPS32 w/36-bit physical address support, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Diff between Linus' and linux-mips git: elf.h, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Diff between Linus' and linux-mips git: elf.h, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |