linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/12] [MIPS] Improve description of VR41xx based machines

To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] [MIPS] Improve description of VR41xx based machines
From: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:59:40 +0900
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp
Envelope-id: tripeaks.co.jp
In-reply-to: <20060320131053.GA29434@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Organization: TriPeaks Corporation
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20060320043802.GA20389@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060320043902.GA20416@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060320152646.1c5690e3.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> <20060320131053.GA29434@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:10:53 +0000
Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote:

> * Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> [2006-03-20 15:26]:
> > > MIPS supports various NEC VR41XX chips and not just the VR4100.
> > > Update Kconfig accordingly, thereby bringing the file in sync with
> > > the linux-mips tree.
> > The linux-mips tree is older than kernel.org about this part.
> 
> Have you looked at the exact change I sent (I know that linux-mips has
> some older stuff, but the patch I sent was against linux-mips+new).
> IOW, is it more correct to say "VR4100" in Kconfig rather than
> "VR41XX", even though more CPUs than the VR4100 are supported?
> 
> All my patch does is a a/VR4100/VR41XX/, really.

VR4131 and VR4133, .... are included in NEC VR4100 series.
These entry have no problem.

Yoichi

see:
http://www.necel.com/micro/english/product/vr/vr.html

> 
> 
> > > - bool "Support for NEC VR4100 series based machines"
> > > + bool "Support for NEC VR41XX-based machines"
> ...
> > > -   The options selects support for the NEC VR4100 series of processors.
> > > +   The options selects support for the NEC VR41xx series of processors.
> > >     Only choose this option if you have one of these processors as a

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>