linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/12] [MIPS] Improve description of VR41xx based machines

To: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/12] [MIPS] Improve description of VR41xx based machines
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:10:53 +0000
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20060320152646.1c5690e3.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20060320043802.GA20389@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060320043902.GA20416@deprecation.cyrius.com> <20060320152646.1c5690e3.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126
* Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> [2006-03-20 15:26]:
> > MIPS supports various NEC VR41XX chips and not just the VR4100.
> > Update Kconfig accordingly, thereby bringing the file in sync with
> > the linux-mips tree.
> The linux-mips tree is older than kernel.org about this part.

Have you looked at the exact change I sent (I know that linux-mips has
some older stuff, but the patch I sent was against linux-mips+new).
IOW, is it more correct to say "VR4100" in Kconfig rather than
"VR41XX", even though more CPUs than the VR4100 are supported?

All my patch does is a a/VR4100/VR41XX/, really.


> > -   bool "Support for NEC VR4100 series based machines"
> > +   bool "Support for NEC VR41XX-based machines"
...
> > -     The options selects support for the NEC VR4100 series of processors.
> > +     The options selects support for the NEC VR41xx series of processors.
> >       Only choose this option if you have one of these processors as a

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>