linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround

from [Ralf Baechle] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:24:34 +0000
Cc: macro@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20060203.020428.59032357.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20060203.013401.41198517.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0602021636380.11727@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20060202165656.GC17352@linux-mips.org> <20060203.020428.59032357.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i 
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 02:04:28AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> Is this preferred?  We can get rid of all TX49XX_MFC0_WAR on this way.

It should be ok for any R4000-style status register.  I'm not sure about
R3000 - but I'm sure Maciej will know.  If he agrees I'd say let's go for
it.

  Ralf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround, Atsushi Nemoto
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround, Sergei Shtylylov
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround, Atsushi Nemoto
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround, Atsushi Nemoto
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]