| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:56:56 +0000 |
| Cc: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0602021636380.11727@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060203.013401.41198517.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0602021636380.11727@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 04:38:37PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:38:37 +0000 (GMT) > From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> > To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> > Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround > Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII > > On Fri, 3 Feb 2006, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > > > Workaround: mask EXL bit of the result or place a nop before mfc0. > [...] > > @@ -55,8 +56,13 @@ __asm__ ( > > " di \n" > > #else > > " mfc0 $1,$12 \n" > > +#if TX49XX_MFC0_WAR && defined(MODULE) > > + " ori $1,3 \n" > > + " xori $1,3 \n" > > +#else > > " ori $1,1 \n" > > " xori $1,1 \n" > > +#endif > > " .set noreorder \n" > > " mtc0 $1,$12 \n" > > #endif > > Hmm, wouldn't that "nop" alternative be simpler? Simpler maybe - but this variant has zero runtime overhead. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: can read/write to mprotect(PROT_NONE) region with 2.6.14 on au1550, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] TX49 MFC0 bug workaround, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |