Andi Kleen wrote: > On Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:02, Akinobu Mita wrote: > >>+static inline unsigned int hweight32(unsigned int w) [] > How large are these functions on x86? Maybe it would be better to not inline > them, > but put it into some C file out of line. hweight8 47 bytes hweight16 76 bytes hweight32 97 bytes hweight64 56 bytes (NOT inlining hweight32) hweight64 197 bytes (inlining hweight32) Those are when compiled as separate non-inlined functions, with pushl %ebp and ret. /mjt |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}(), Andi Kleen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}(), Andi Kleen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}(), Andi Kleen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 14/44] generic hweight{64,32,16,8}(), Andi Kleen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |