| To: | Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gdb vs. gdbserver with -mips3 / 32bitmode userspace |
| From: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> |
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:42:53 +0000 |
| Cc: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20060131181414.GA8288@linuxtv.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060131171508.GB6341@linuxtv.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0601311724340.31371@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20060131181414.GA8288@linuxtv.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.11 |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 07:14:14PM +0100, Johannes Stezenbach wrote: [snip] > Yes, that's why I said I'm confused about mips_isa_regsize() vs. > mips_abi_regsize(). > > mips_abi_regsize() correctly says the register size is 32bit for o32, > but mips_register_type() calls mips_isa_regsize(), not > mips_abi_regsize(). That's why I chose to "fix" mips_isa_regsize(). > > Or should mips_register_type() simply call mips_abi_regsize()? Without having had a look at the code I think that's the right fix. > Or is the correct fix to change gdbserver to transfer registers > in mips_isa_regsize() size, i.e. 64bit for 64bit ISA? > (But gdb would't use the upper 32bits of the registers anyway > with o32 ABI, and this would be more complicated to fix.) Thiemo |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: gdb vs. gdbserver with -mips3 / 32bitmode userspace, Johannes Stezenbach |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: gdb vs. gdbserver with -mips3 / 32bitmode userspace, Johannes Stezenbach |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gdb vs. gdbserver with -mips3 / 32bitmode userspace, Johannes Stezenbach |
| Next by Thread: | Re: gdb vs. gdbserver with -mips3 / 32bitmode userspace, Johannes Stezenbach |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |