| To: | Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu |
| From: | Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:31:27 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NyG0GsrtYNZW9ADr10xYmsQoWmESjgQgzkj941ybHG1+QST0C84h9brdojIbe/iwXNL4D2xfjYXQ7X7BvVzzujJQG71UXWHbpChAt1LzObOXiGiO6RNXo77/IFt12fEoNou2eiFEmlVywqq3uN77nYSmxmFow59yUr8QAhVkFYE= |
| In-reply-to: | <43D8F000.9010106@mips.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80601250136p5ee350e6g@mail.gmail.com> <43D78725.6050300@mips.com> <20060125141424.GE3454@linux-mips.org> <cda58cb80601250632r3e8f7b9en@mail.gmail.com> <20060125150404.GF3454@linux-mips.org> <cda58cb80601251003m6ba4379w@mail.gmail.com> <43D7C050.5090607@mips.com> <cda58cb80601260702wf781e70l@mail.gmail.com> <005101c6228c$6ebfb0a0$10eca8c0@grendel> <43D8F000.9010106@mips.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
2006/1/26, Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>:
>
>
> Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
>
> >Could you please post your mipsel-linux-gcc -v output? It might help.
> >I've never tried building Linux with any of the Sc/Sd/SmartMIPS options,
> >so I really don't know what you could be experiencing. One thought that
> >comes to mind is that the -march=4ksd option may be treated as a hint to
> >generate compact code (for smart cards) in a way that -march=mips32r2
> >is not. I'll ask around...
> >
> >
>
> Assuming that this is the SDE compiler, then I think that the only
yes it is (see my previous post)
> significant thing which -march=4ksd will do differently from
> -march=mips32r2 is to allow the compiler to generate branch-likely
> instructions -- they're deprecated for generic mips32 code but carry no
> penalty on the 4K core. It will also cause the compiler's "4kc" pipeline
> description to be used for instruction scheduling, instead of the
> default "24kc", but that should only change the order of instructions
Do you mean that the code can be run faster when using -march=4ksd ?
> and shouldn't really make a significant difference to the code size.
>
yes but I have :(
Thanks
--
Franck
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h, Nicolas Pitre |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h, Russell King |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu, Nigel Stephens |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] Optimize swab operations on mips_r2 cpu, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |