linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h

To: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>, Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>, dev-etrax@axis.com, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, linuxsh-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, ultralinux@vger.kernel.org, Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h
From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:06:18 -0800
In-reply-to: <20060125200250.GA26443@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Mail-followup-to: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>, Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com>, dev-etrax@axis.com, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux390@de.ibm.com, linuxsh-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists.sourceforge.net, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, ultralinux@vger.kernel.org, Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@lsi.nec.co.jp>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20060125112625.GA18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125113206.GD18584@miraclelinux.com> <20060125200250.GA26443@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 08:02:50PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > +   s = 16; if (word << 16 != 0) s = 0; b += s; word >>= s;
> > +   s =  8; if (word << 24 != 0) s = 0; b += s; word >>= s;
> > +   s =  4; if (word << 28 != 0) s = 0; b += s; word >>= s;
...
> Basically, shifts which depend on a variable are more expensive than
> constant-based shifts.

Actually, they're all constant shifts.  Just written stupidly.


r~

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>