| To: | David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: gcc -3.4.4 and linux-2.4.32 |
| From: | "P. Christeas" <p_christ@hol.gr> |
| Date: | Thu, 19 Jan 2006 00:35:17 +0200 |
| Cc: | Kishore K <hellokishore@gmail.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <200601171426.10317.p_christ@hol.gr> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <f07e6e0601160423h5ce1c0d7lcb7e38f8509c4116@mail.gmail.com> <43CBD91B.4020607@avtrex.com> <200601171426.10317.p_christ@hol.gr> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9 |
On Tuesday 17 January 2006 2:26 pm, P. Christeas wrote: > > Does that apply to gcc-4.0.2 as well? It is mentioned in linux > documentation that -funit-at-a-time is safe as of gcc-4.x. Is there (I'm > not a MIPS expert) a way to verify whether gcc produces wrong instructions? > I've had a similar problem (I only try with gcc 4, because I compile linux > 2.6) and is reduced when I use -fno-unit-at-a-time. Still, I have > instability, which now appears less often. > I've tried the '-fno-unit-at-a-time' solution (for the whole kernel) and > the 'pop/push' at interrupt.h fix. > Just to let you know: In a very interesting twist, gcc4.0.2 produces a faulty kernel with the 2.4.31 kernel (as the latter is provided from the hardware's manufacturer). I'm validating gcc and binutils at the moment. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Cobalt Raq2 HD upgrade - Advice required, Dominique Quatravaux |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cobalt Raq2 HD upgrade - Advice required, freshy98 |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: gcc -3.4.4 and linux-2.4.32, P. Christeas |
| Next by Thread: | Re: gcc -3.4.4 and linux-2.4.32, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |