| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH Cobalt 1/1] 64-bit fix |
| From: | Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:59:54 -0800 |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, tbm@cyrius.com, pdh@colonel-panic.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20060117.232350.93019515.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20060116154543.GA26771@deprecation.cyrius.com> <43CBCAAE.6030403@jg555.com> <20060117135145.GE3336@linux-mips.org> <20060117.232350.93019515.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) |
Atsushi Nemoto wrote: How can we get this resolved, this issue has been open a long time. Can we all work together to get a working solution in place that everyone will accept?But got no response at that time. So I ask again. Could you tell us how the iomap patch broken verbosely, please? We all need to understand the concerns with the current method. The only issue I see from Ralf is the following: Broken on multiple PCI busses.Now the way I understand the issue is the current iomap.c only handles a single bus, Ralf's point is that if there are multiple busses this patch may not work properly. Is that a correct statement Ralf. So can't we have one iomap.c for single pci bus systems and one for multiple pci bus systems? Just a thought. -- ---- Jim Gifford maillist@jg555.com |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: gdb gets confused with o32 core files, WANT_COMPAT_REG_H needed?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Cobalt Raq2 HD upgrade - Advice required, Dominique Quatravaux |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH Cobalt 1/1] 64-bit fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH Cobalt 1/1] 64-bit fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |