linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH Cobalt 1/1] 64-bit fix

To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Cobalt 1/1] 64-bit fix
From: Jim Gifford <maillist@jg555.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:59:54 -0800
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, tbm@cyrius.com, pdh@colonel-panic.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20060117.232350.93019515.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20060116154543.GA26771@deprecation.cyrius.com> <43CBCAAE.6030403@jg555.com> <20060117135145.GE3336@linux-mips.org> <20060117.232350.93019515.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201)
Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
But got no response at that time.  So I ask again.  Could you tell us
how the iomap patch broken verbosely, please?

How can we get this resolved, this issue has been open a long time. Can we all work together to get a working solution in place that everyone will accept?

We all need to understand the concerns with the current method. The only issue I see from Ralf is the following:

   Broken on multiple PCI busses.

Now the way I understand the issue is the current iomap.c only handles a single bus, Ralf's point is that if there are multiple busses this patch may not work properly. Is that a correct statement Ralf.

So can't we have one iomap.c for single pci bus systems and one for multiple pci bus systems? Just a thought.

--
----
Jim Gifford
maillist@jg555.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>