| To: | Alex Gonzalez <langabe@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Compiling a non-pic glibc |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:11:14 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <c58a7a270601120218r77ec0d8drf2d14663138a13c2@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <c58a7a270601120218r77ec0d8drf2d14663138a13c2@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:18:03AM +0000, Alex Gonzalez wrote: > Hi, > > What is the correct way of cross-compiling a non-pic static glibc? Forget it. The non-PIC support for glibc is rotting away since ages. Why do you want a non-PIC glibc? Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: gcc -3.4.4 and linux-2.4.32, Kishore K |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: atomic_add function on memory allocated with dma_alloc_coherent hangs, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Compiling a non-pic glibc, Daniel Jacobowitz |
| Next by Thread: | does the linux kernel use k0, k1 regs?, zhuzhenhua |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |