[Top] [All Lists]

Re: why the early_initcall(au1x00_setup) do not work?

To: "P. Christeas" <>
Subject: Re: why the early_initcall(au1x00_setup) do not work?
From: Ivan Korzakow <>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:15:18 +0100
Cc:, Ralf Baechle <>
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta;; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=djh5j5BiFviIDAWhc37UPmvdEM9hKVUH2l4wBPV+d8+LqDyQI0ZrHyfkak97Y/p/1wjWPOP3V38gB21Xldg53Lfg2NgMFPgxuJOBc8UP0ZBeKca9cgU32k9/Cbyxsl/aB8S9zvYipc8oS51A1RA/Z6Yb/gOXHH9wImFd9Ajev0U=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <>
2006/1/10, P. Christeas <>:
> On Tuesday 10 January 2006 6:38 pm, Ivan Korzakow wrote:
> > 2006/1/10, P. Christeas <>:
> > > You make sure you have the two trees and diff them.
> > > They 're both in git and typically you could do that only using git.
> >
> > Have you ever tried what you're talking about or is it a guess ?
> > For example, let's say that there's a bug introduced when merging
> > Linus tree with mips branch. How do you easily "bisect" in order to do
> > a binary seek of this bug ?
>  I was about to mention the git incompatibility as I gave you the first
> answer. It's true what you say and I also find it annoying. That's why I use
> Linus tree.
> I cannot, though, complaint to Ralph about this practice. It seems that he has
> done his best to preserve the CVS history of his tree. We can only thank him
> for that. It is just a lot of work to trim the tree and make it
> Linus-parallel.
Why not simply keep CVS repository available for 1% of people willing
to browse the history ? And make life easier for 99% of people willing
to work on 2.6 ... (2.4 work may continue to use CVS too).


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>