| To: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LL and SC instruction simulation |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:51:52 +0000 |
| Cc: | Sathesh Babu Edara <satheshbabu.edara@analog.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <00fd01c61533$ef797e30$10eca8c0@grendel> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <200601090742.k097gYaZ017304@lilac.hdcindia.analog.com> <200601090749.k097nFaZ017891@lilac.hdcindia.analog.com> <20060109145425.GA4286@linux-mips.org> <00af01c6152f$dc1863f0$10eca8c0@grendel> <20060109152148.GD4286@linux-mips.org> <20060109153028.GA6542@linux-mips.org> <00fd01c61533$ef797e30$10eca8c0@grendel> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 04:47:01PM +0100, Kevin D. Kissell wrote: > Hmm. I can think of at least one *very* high volume MIPS Linux platform still > manufactured by a very large Japanese electronics company where LL/SC > either isn't implemented or doesn't work... The user community of that platform of that four letter vendor still hasn't managed to upgrade their kernels to something that would even be remotely contemporary, so any 2.6 questions don't apply ... Ralf |
| Previous by Date: | Re: LL and SC instruction simulation, Kevin D. Kissell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Force MMC/SD to 512 byte block sizes, Jordan Crouse |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LL and SC instruction simulation, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Next by Thread: | Re:, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |