| To: | "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "Sathesh Babu Edara" <satheshbabu.edara@analog.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: LL and SC instruction simulation |
| From: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:17:50 +0100 |
| Cc: | <linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org>, <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <200601090742.k097gYaZ017304@lilac.hdcindia.analog.com> <200601090749.k097nFaZ017891@lilac.hdcindia.analog.com> <20060109145425.GA4286@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Ralf writes:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:19:46PM +0530, Sathesh Babu Edara wrote:
>
> > We have ported linux-2.4.18 and linux-2-6.12 kernel (mips.org)onto MIPS
> > processor (CPU type lx4189).
> >
> > We observed that on 2.4 kernel,ll and sc instruction exception handlers
> > hitting very often.
> > Where as on linux-2.6.12 this is not happening.
>
> > Can anybody have idea why this instructions are hitting on 2.4.18 kernel and
> > not on 2-6.12 kernel.
>
> Only ll/sc instructions in application software can be emulated, so it
> would seem your application is behaving different on 2.4 and 2.6 kernels.
Is there an interface where 2.6 might be telling library code to use system
calls
instead LL/SC, where the 2.4 kernel didn't?
Regards,
Kevin K.
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: why the early_initcall(au1x00_setup) do not work?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: why the early_initcall(au1x00_setup) do not work?, P. Christeas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: LL and SC instruction simulation, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: LL and SC instruction simulation, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |