| To: | kernel coder <lhrkernelcoder@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped |
| From: | Brett Foster <fosterb@uoguelph.ca> |
| Date: | Sat, 07 Jan 2006 02:38:11 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <f69849430601062302if424acey70e98f86e0de36e6@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <f69849430601062302if424acey70e98f86e0de36e6@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
kernel coder wrote: UDP was not designed with reliability in mind -- it really isn't meant for sending a 10 meg file without a packet loss.hi, I was trying to measure the UDP reception speed on my borad which has MIPS 4kc processor with 133 MHZ speed.I was transfering 10mb file from intel pentium 4 machine to MIPS board,but the recieved file was only 900kB. When i further investigated the problem ,i came to know that the user application was not getting enough opportunities to get data from socket queue which caused almost 80% of packets to be dropped as socket queue had no free space. (Among other sources) I'm pretty sure this behaviour was discussed in: Unix Network Programming, Vol. 1: The Sockets Networking API, Third Edition (Something like page 257.) I don't know if there is anything else going on with the kernel but... Brett |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped, kernel coder |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Previous by Thread: | Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped, kernel coder |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Almost 80% of UDP packets dropped, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |