| To: | Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@lug-owl.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: does someone succeed in making the toolchain for 2.6 kernel? |
| From: | Matej Kupljen <matej.kupljen@ultra.si> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:32:16 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20051221100619.GW13985@lug-owl.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <50c9a2250512210051q85f813fx27b0533fe66165e2@mail.gmail.com> <20051221085539.GS13985@lug-owl.de> <50c9a2250512210104j4a19e37cu30c795d4acc226d2@mail.gmail.com> <20051221091852.GT13985@lug-owl.de> <1135159354.5211.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20051221100619.GW13985@lug-owl.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hi > > Yes, we use crosstool, but the results matrix isn't rely > > encouraging: > > http://www.kegel.com/crosstool/crosstool-0.38/buildlogs/ > > Well, try do do it any better *yourself*. Compiling a complete > toolchain (incl. userland support) really isn't easy... You probably misunderstood me :( I was trying to say, that we use crosstool *successfully* to build kernel 2.6.15-rc5 (and a bunch of user land binaries) and that this matrix should be updated. If someone looks at this matrix, he thinks that for mips(el) crosstool does not work. BR, Matej |
| Previous by Date: | Re: does someone succeed in making the toolchain for 2.6 kernel?, P. Christeas |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: does someone succeed in making the toolchain for 2.6 kernel?, zhuzhenhua |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: does someone succeed in making the toolchain for 2.6 kernel?, Jan-Benedict Glaw |
| Next by Thread: | Re: does someone succeed in making the toolchain for 2.6 kernel?, zhuzhenhua |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |