| To: | "Knittel, Brian" <Brian.Knittel@powertv.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Saving arguments on the stack |
| From: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@mips.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Nov 2005 09:53:10 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <762C0A863A7674478671627FEAF5848105AF92D2@hqmail01.powertv.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <762C0A863A7674478671627FEAF5848105AF92D2@hqmail01.powertv.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) |
Knittel, Brian wrote: Hi, I'd like to force the compiler to store arguments on the stack with otherwise optimized code. I found a refernce in the archives (form 2001) for using -0 (no optimization). Has anyone found another way to do this?
If I recall correctly, if you specify -g to enable debugger support,
the subroutine prologues store the arguments into their stack slots,
even if a higher level of optimization is otherwise specified.
Regards,
Kevin K.
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Saving arguments on the stack, Knittel, Brian |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Saving arguments on the stack, Nigel Stephens |
| Previous by Thread: | Saving arguments on the stack, Knittel, Brian |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Saving arguments on the stack, Nigel Stephens |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |