| To: | ralf@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: cpu_idle and cpu_wait |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Thu, 17 Nov 2005 11:21:45 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20051116184201.GJ3229@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20051117.011906.25910026.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20051116184201.GJ3229@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:42:01 +0000, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> >>>>> said: >> The CPU can surely exit from the WAIT instruction by interrupt even >> if interrupts disabled? ralf> That's implementation dependent behaviour, unfortunately. I checked some MIPS32/MIPS64 datasheets and found that's really inplementation-dependent. The answer is YES on (perhaps) all MIPS4K? processors but NO on 20Kc, 24K ... And I checked x86 implemetation and found that HLT or MWAIT instruction also must be used with interrupts enabled. So IIUC it seems x86 have same latency problem too. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: cpu_idle and cpu_wait, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: cpu_idle and cpu_wait, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cpu_idle and cpu_wait, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: cpu_idle and cpu_wait, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |