linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: git and tags...

To: Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: git and tags...
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 18:45:21 +0000
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <cda58cb80511080925l2d441604i@mail.gmail.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <cda58cb80511080249w7d902821n@mail.gmail.com> <20051108110134.GA2689@linux-mips.org> <cda58cb80511080925l2d441604i@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Franck wrote:

> OK, so tags have been renamed into "linux-2.6.x". Why not using the
> same mainline name convention (v2.6.x) ?

The same reason that some people like blue and others prefer green ;-)

> I have another question (which is the first one in my previous email),
> how can I make my working tree a kernel version 2.6.9 for example ?

git-read-tree $(cat .git/refs/tags/linux-2.6.9)
git-checkout-index -f -a -u -q

> And the last question related to mips git repository, why does kernel
> v2.2, v2.4, v2.6 are in the same repository ? Why not seperate
> different major version of the kernel in a seperate repository ?

The extra space consumption for all these historic versions in a
compressed git repository is extremly little.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>