| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] remove mips_rtc_lock |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:26:43 +0000 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20051103.231250.25477564.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20051103.010240.41630907.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20051103110552.GA3149@linux-mips.org> <20051103.231250.25477564.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 11:12:50PM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:05:53 +0000, Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> > >>>>> said: > > ralf> The difference between and get_rtc_time and rtc_get_time is less > ralf> than obvious. Same for set_rtc_time and rtc_set_time ... > > Sure. Also I suppose majority of RTC prefer struct rtc_time than > unsigned long. Is it time for redesign the mips RTC interface? ;-) More than that, the whole MIPS time code while functional is such a beauty it could make a grown man cry ... Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] remove mips_rtc_lock, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: linux kernel building for mips malta target board, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] remove mips_rtc_lock, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFC] The driver model, I2C and gpio provision on Sharp SL-C1000 (Akita), Andy Isaacson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |