| To: | Aaditya Rai <arai@atheros.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability. |
| From: | "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill@realitydiluted.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 21 Oct 2005 22:14:53 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <43598DFE.8040100@atheros.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <43598DFE.8040100@atheros.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Debian Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050802) |
Aaditya Rai wrote: Hi everyone, I've searched the list for an answer and gotten, "there's no stable release; check out from cvs" ;-) I'm trying to figure out if there are stability issues with mips port of 2.6? Specifically for 24K? Is mips-2.4 generally considered to be more stable? Use 2.6 if you are working with 24K. Yes, it is stable that's why we are using 2.6 and not 2.5 because the even numbers are stable releases. *sigh* Geesh, kids these days. -Steve |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability., Aaditya Rai |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability., Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability., Aaditya Rai |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mips 2.4 vs 2.6 stability., Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |