| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 8/12] cerr-printk-not-prom-printf |
| From: | Dominic Sweetman <dom@mips.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:02:33 +0100 |
| Cc: | Andrew Isaacson <adi@broadcom.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20051020104902.GA9491@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20051020065320.GA23857@broadcom.com> <20051020065757.GH23899@broadcom.com> <20051020104902.GA9491@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Ralf Baechle (ralf@linux-mips.org) writes: > The reason for this old commit was that this code is running > uncached, so the operation of ll/sc in the spinlocks is undefined > according to the MIPS64 spec... The answer is more complicated. MIPS64 (elsewhere) requires that the ll/sc "link" is broken on an exceptin - in fact on an 'eret' instruction. So ll/sc on an uncached location works just fine in a uniprocessor. However, it's unlikely that any cache-coherent mulitprocessor system will snoop uncached reads and writes, so it won't work in an SMP system. -- Dominic |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 8/12] cerr-printk-not-prom-printf, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 8/12] cerr-printk-not-prom-printf, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 8/12] cerr-printk-not-prom-printf, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 8/12] cerr-printk-not-prom-printf, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |