| To: | David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: OProfile cannot be loaded as module... |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:38:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <435518CC.3060403@avtrex.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <43470BCF.1070709@avtrex.com> <20051013225520.GA3234@linux-mips.org> <43540609.4000105@avtrex.com> <20051018110355.GB2656@linux-mips.org> <435518CC.3060403@avtrex.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 08:46:20AM -0700, David Daney wrote: > Given your 'yes' and 'no' answers, the behavior of a module could depend > on the order in which the modules are loaded, as they can be linked > differently depending on which modules are already present. > > That doesn't seem like a good way of doing things. > > If if were up to me (and I know that it is not), I would disallow > linking of weak symbols at module load time altogether. The semantics were choosen by Rusty who maintains the generic part of the module loader. Ensuring the right load order is the job of depmod and modprobe. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | power management on mips, Ivan Korzakow |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: power management on mips, sjhill |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: OProfile cannot be loaded as module..., David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | rfc about an uncommented string, Carlo Perassi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |