| To: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: rfc about an uncommented string |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:51:15 +0100 |
| Cc: | Fuxin Zhang <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn>, Carlo Perassi <carlo@linux.it>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510101327500.5402@numbat.sonytel.be> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20051009134106.GB9091@voyager> <20051010111149.GC2661@linux-mips.org> <434A4F27.6010301@ict.ac.cn> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510101327500.5402@numbat.sonytel.be> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > I don't read the 2.6 code,but it seems it remains the same as the copy > > in 2.4(except that #ifdef changes).I can't see why the code is broken? > > In case you mean the ioport address,mips_io_port_base for that board is > > 0xa0000000, inb(0x14000060) is reading from 0xb4000060, which is correct > > for it. > > Shouldn't mips_io_port_base be 0xb4000000 for your board, so inb(0x60) looks > more like a PC-style keyboard controller access? Exactly. Anyway - what this did actually demonstrate is that at least there's no 2.6 user of the IT8172. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: rfc about an uncommented string, Geert Uytterhoeven |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: rfc about an uncommented string, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: rfc about an uncommented string, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | git, rsync, and firewalls..., Don Hiatt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |