linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: rfc about an uncommented string

To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: rfc about an uncommented string
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:51:15 +0100
Cc: Fuxin Zhang <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn>, Carlo Perassi <carlo@linux.it>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510101327500.5402@numbat.sonytel.be>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20051009134106.GB9091@voyager> <20051010111149.GC2661@linux-mips.org> <434A4F27.6010301@ict.ac.cn> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0510101327500.5402@numbat.sonytel.be>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 01:28:43PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> > I don't read the 2.6 code,but it seems it remains the same as the copy
> > in 2.4(except that #ifdef changes).I can't see why the code is broken?
> > In case you mean the ioport address,mips_io_port_base for that board is
> > 0xa0000000, inb(0x14000060) is reading from 0xb4000060, which is correct
> > for it.
> 
> Shouldn't mips_io_port_base be 0xb4000000 for your board, so inb(0x60) looks
> more like a PC-style keyboard controller access?

Exactly.

Anyway - what this did actually demonstrate is that at least there's
no 2.6 user of the IT8172.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>