linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] fix warning in tlbex.c for CONFIG_32BIT

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix warning in tlbex.c for CONFIG_32BIT
From: David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:48:02 -0700
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20051005105336.GH2699@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <4343586E.4030703@avtrex.com> <20051005105336.GH2699@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929)
Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:37:02PM -0700, David Daney wrote:

Date:   Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:37:02 -0700
From:   David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com>
To:     linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix warning in tlbex.c for CONFIG_32BIT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

                                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Applied - BUT: your mailer garbles patches ...


Some people on this list are quite adamant that patches be in-line.

I was trying to see how my mailer (Thunderbird) handled this. Obviously (in hindsight) it screws things up.

Sending as an attachment works well except some mailers (Not Thunderbird) cannot quote attached patches with out jumping through hoops.

I don't really want to change the mailer that I am using, so I am in a bit of a bind WRT submitting patches here.

FWIW other mailing lists (binutils, gcc) don't seem to have the same trouble with attached patches.

David Daney

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>