|To:||Ralf Baechle <firstname.lastname@example.org>|
|Subject:||Re: [PATCH] fix warning in tlbex.c for CONFIG_32BIT|
|From:||David Daney <email@example.com>|
|Date:||Wed, 05 Oct 2005 08:48:02 -0700|
|User-agent:||Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc3 (X11/20050929)|
Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Tue, Oct 04, 2005 at 09:37:02PM -0700, David Daney wrote:Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:37:02 -0700 From: David Daney <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com Subject: [PATCH] fix warning in tlbex.c for CONFIG_32BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Applied - BUT: your mailer garbles patches ...
Some people on this list are quite adamant that patches be in-line.I was trying to see how my mailer (Thunderbird) handled this. Obviously (in hindsight) it screws things up.
Sending as an attachment works well except some mailers (Not Thunderbird) cannot quote attached patches with out jumping through hoops.
I don't really want to change the mailer that I am using, so I am in a bit of a bind WRT submitting patches here.
FWIW other mailing lists (binutils, gcc) don't seem to have the same trouble with attached patches.
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [PATCH] Add support for 4KS cpu., Maciej W. Rozycki|
|Next by Date:||The NUBI ..., David Daney|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [PATCH] fix warning in tlbex.c for CONFIG_32BIT, Ralf Baechle|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [PATCH] fix warning in tlbex.c for CONFIG_32BIT, Ralf Baechle|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|