| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for 4KS cpu. |
| From: | Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:10:52 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=azPCltp/P86HLYt955oXYKpYS2gMtU3tF3sn5UsK/rB0kubopNBGCI090+g1X89ADFw5/OjED87zcx+8nv1wHCu7xJtqw2+JTaT6noTT2zXjXi43bLtZnBOvCFEly0B/lnjnuF97Qm6tt2GufutVReg2WxtTRQradnkVYk91Z00= |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0510041430120.10696@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <cda58cb80510040149p690397afo@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0510041219500.10696@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <cda58cb80510040610k1a7f430fn@mail.gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0510041430120.10696@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Reply-to: | Franck <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
2005/10/4, Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@linux-mips.org>:
> See my other comment in this thread. As to the SmartMIPS/crypto
> instructions -- unless they are going to be emitted by GCC for the kernel
> build (which I seriously doubt), there is no point in enabling them.
>
some assembly code could...
> > algorithms. And have some extra bits in TLB to protect pages from
> > being execute for example. These are the main differences that I can
>
> Now that may be of potential interest of the kernel, but again, that's in
> principle probably not specific to these processors,
>
hmm, I'm not an expert in MIPS cpu as you guys, so can you give me an
example of others processors that have such TLB features ?
> > remember. Big fat warning: I sent all support I have done for these
> > cpu, _not_ more, _not_ less. I agree it's almost nothing but it's a
> > start...
>
> Well, it's probably a bit too early for inclusion, but it's certainly not
> for a review. By sending changes here for discussion early you may avoid
> a lot of hassle later when you may discover a major update is required for
> them to be accepted. Good luck!
Actually Ralf asked for it in a previous thread.
Thanks
--
Franck
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for 4KS cpu., Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for 4KS cpu., Franck |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for 4KS cpu., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Add support for 4KS cpu., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |