linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-mips Vs kernel.org

To: Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>
Subject: Re: linux-mips Vs kernel.org
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:36:52 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20050928005432.7d45b2f9.yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <OFDDFCB8DC.1BFCCB3E-ONC1257089.002AE830-C1257089.002B3D8D@sagem.com> <20050927093922.GA3793@linux-mips.org> <20050928005432.7d45b2f9.yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:54:32AM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote:

> > > We currently working with the 2.6.12 kernel, and wondering which from 
> > > linux-mips or kernel.org version we should use,
> > > in a more general manner, what are the differences between linux-mips and 
> > > kernel.org kernel source code, is one the
> > > mirror of the other, or is there one that frequently merge with the other 
> > > ?
> > 
> > At this stage the kernel.org tree is quite unusable for MIPS.
> 
> I have no problem kernel.org GIT with VR41xx.

See RFC 1925, section 2 (3):

With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: linux-mips Vs kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <=