| To: | Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: linux-mips Vs kernel.org |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:36:52 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20050928005432.7d45b2f9.yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <OFDDFCB8DC.1BFCCB3E-ONC1257089.002AE830-C1257089.002B3D8D@sagem.com> <20050927093922.GA3793@linux-mips.org> <20050928005432.7d45b2f9.yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:54:32AM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote: > > > We currently working with the 2.6.12 kernel, and wondering which from > > > linux-mips or kernel.org version we should use, > > > in a more general manner, what are the differences between linux-mips and > > > kernel.org kernel source code, is one the > > > mirror of the other, or is there one that frequently merge with the other > > > ? > > > > At this stage the kernel.org tree is quite unusable for MIPS. > > I have no problem kernel.org GIT with VR41xx. See RFC 1925, section 2 (3): With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 1/5] SiByte fixes for 2.6.12, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Au1550 Serial port - linux-2.6.13.2, Kyle Unice |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch] db1550: useless memset() call, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Au1550 Serial port - linux-2.6.13.2, Kyle Unice |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |