| To: | Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 4/5] SiByte fixes for 2.6.12 |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 1 Oct 2005 12:57:26 +0100 |
| Cc: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20050623222709.GC26427@hexapodia.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20050622230151.GA17970@broadcom.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506231208120.17155@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050623144926.GA10216@hexapodia.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61L.0506231601270.17155@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20050623222709.GC26427@hexapodia.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:27:09PM -0700, Andy Isaacson wrote: > > Well, I've had a look at the code and it's such a mess. Obviously > > calling ld_mmu_r4xx0() (or any of the other variants) should not be > > compiled conditionally and more specific cases, i.e. based on PRId values > > should take precedence. I'll see if I can make it better. > > I certainly won't argue with a cleanup of arch/mips/mm/cache.c, that > code has annoyed me from first laying eyes on it... So just did that, cpu_cache_init is looking bearable now. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 1/5] SiByte fixes for 2.6.12, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: support for NS DP83847, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 1/5] SiByte fixes for 2.6.12, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: support for NS DP83847, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |