On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 08:46:55PM +0100, Dominic Sweetman wrote:
> Ralf Baechle (firstname.lastname@example.org) writes:
> > I quite deliberately did omit DSP support from 64-bit ptrace(2); there
> > is currently no MIPS64 processor with DSP support that I know of.
> This is true so far.
> But assuming that 64-bit processing becomes increasingly interesting
> (which seems certain) and that some kind of DSP support with extra
> registers remains attractive (which seems fairly likely)... well, I'd
> have said that any 64-bit MIPS CPU configured from now on is quite
> likely to have extra DSP registers.
> So while "you aren't going to need it" for a while, anyone thinking of
> doing a non-compatible change to ptrace might want to reserve some
> space for these registers.
In the future they should be added using PTRACE_GETDSPREGS, or
something similar. No one's designed that yet, so the first person to
need it gets to do it right.