On Tue, 2005-09-13 07:15:03 -0500, sjhill@realitydiluted.com
<sjhill@realitydiluted.com> wrote:
> > As a heads up, I've started playing with GIT as the replacement of CVS.
> > For information on the status of that conversion please see
> >
> I assume the reason for choosing GIT was because the main line kernel
> uses the same source management tool. No chance of using Subversion I
> guess.
Is SVN already distributed? In the past, the non-distributed reality
of CVS is what bought me a lot of trouble. And SVN isn't really
designed for distribution, is it?
I for one see SVN as a CVS rewrite with some design flaws fixed, but
it's for sure not what I actually want to use.
So I'm currently learning to use GIT. It's a bit strange when you
start using it (because usually I interact with git itself as well as
with eg. cogito), but I slowly get used to it :-)
MfG, JBG
--
Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _
"Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O
für einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O
ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA));
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
|