Re: unkillable process due to setup_frame() failure

["Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>]

On Wed, 7 Sep 2005, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> So my "which is preferred" question was inappropriate.  I had to ask
> "#1 or #2 or both or other ?"

 We should be consistent with other platforms -- having a look at e.g. the 
i386 (as it used to be the reference) and the alpha (as close-enough to 
MIPS) should reveal the answer.  IIRC, a SIGSEGV that has a handler 
installed, but which cannot be callled due to a bad stack pointer is 
forced to SIG_DFL, but you may want to double-check it.

  Maciej